Baseline tumor burden and outcomes in patients with rare cancers treated with immunotherapy (Southwest Oncology Group trial S1609).
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41892875.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/cncr.70374 and PMC identifier 13025072.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
It has been suggested that baseline tumor burden may correlate with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) outcome for individual tumor types in which ICIs are standardly used. The authors investigated whether pretreatment tumor burden correlates with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor regression among patients who had rare cancers treated with dual ICIs. Southwest Oncology Group study S1609 was a phase 2, National Cancer Institute/Southwest Oncology Group basket study (>1000 sites) evaluating nivolumab plus ipilimumab in 53 cohorts of patients who had rare/ultrarare malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02834013). Overall, 722 patients were included in this secondary analysis, all of whom had measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1). Baseline tumor burden, defined as the sum of the greatest dimensions of target lesions at study registration, was analyzed based on quartiles observed in the data. The number of target lesions was also considered a secondary tumor burden measure. End points included OS and PFS. Larger baseline tumor burden correlated with shorter OS, but not PFS (multivariable analysis). Higher baseline tumor burden quartiles had only a weak negative association with any tumor regression at first scan (Fisher exact test, p = .09), and multivariable analyses further indicated that both tumor burden and any tumor regression at first posttreatment scan were independently associated with OS in multivariable analysis (comparing a baseline tumor size ≥12.9 cm vs. 1.0-4.8 cm; hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.72; p = .032), but there was no evidence of an interaction between tumor burden and any tumor regression at the first scan (p for interaction > .65). Larger baseline tumor burden was associated with worse OS, but not PFS, and was not predictive of tumor regression after dual ICI therapy in a large cohort with rare cancer types.
Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms
- Tumor Burden
- Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
- Rare Diseases
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
- Immunotherapy