Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Report of the iSCAD Registry.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41904991.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jamacardio.2026.1009 and PMC identifier 13034164.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction predominantly affecting women. There is a paucity of reproductive health data surrounding pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). To examine detailed reproductive variables as well as demographics, psychosocial, and SCAD-event factors among women with a history of at least 1 prior pregnancy in a large, multicenter registry (iSCAD Registry). This cohort study compared data of women with P-SCAD vs women with non-pregnancy-associated SCAD (NP-SCAD) between the years 2019 and 2024 and rates of certain reproductive health features among the general reproductive-aged population in US states. Differences were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. Pregnancy and SCAD. Patient survey-based clinical and reproductive history variables were collected and corroborated with investigator-extracted clinical and imaging data, including detailed characterization of the SCAD event. Among 907 women (median [IQR] age at enrollment, 52.0 [45.1-59.4] years; median [IQR] age at first SCAD event, 49.2 [42.3-57.1] years) with SCAD and 1 or more pregnancies, 98 had P-SCAD with median (IQR) age of 36.7 (33.7-39.1) years at time of SCAD event. Those with P-SCAD had a lower prevalence of fibromuscular dysplasia (27 of 86 [31%] vs 309 of 681 [45%]; P = .01) but similar rates of extracoronary abnormalities. Greater use of assisted reproductive technology (ART; 25 of 97 [26%] vs 98 of 804 [12%]), greater multigravida with more than 5 gestations (13 of 98 [13%] vs 55 of 809 [7%]), and preeclampsia (24 of 98 [25%] vs 101 of 809 [13%]; P = .001) were reported among women with P-SCAD. Those with P-SCAD had a more severe SCAD phenotype including higher incidence of STEMI (16 of 86 [18.6%] vs 40 of 733 [5.5%]; P < .001), multivessel segment involvement (22 of 70 [31%] vs 101 of 588 [17%]; P = .004), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 40% (4 of 15 [27%] vs 6 of 105 [7%]; P = .006). They also experienced less LVEF recovery by 1-year follow-up. The majority (661 of 887 [75%]) of both groups were primarily medically managed. From this large, multisite registry, results reveal that women with P-SCAD had greater median ages at gestation, greater history of ART use, and greater instances of multigravida and preeclampsia than women with NP-SCAD and the general reproductive-aged US population. With high percentages of vascular imaging among participants, women with P-SCAD had less fibromuscular dysplasia but similar rates of extracoronary abnormalities including dissection and aneurysms as women with NP-SCAD. In this contemporary cohort, women with P-SCAD continue to represent a higher-risk phenotype with predominantly conservative management; however, they had less LVEF recovery.