Demographic and Prognostic Significance of Surgically-Treated Intrathyroidal Thymic Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41931541.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/wjs.70345.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To synthesize evidence on the demographic and prognostic profile of surgically treated intrathyroidal thymic carcinoma (ITC). A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Due to the rarity of the disease, all patients with surgically treated ITC were combined from individual case reports to create a cohort of patients which was subsequently pooled with other eligible case series. Single-arm meta-analysis was used to synthesize a demographic profile and Kaplan-Meier statistics were used for survival analyses. Analysis of 55 articles (154 patients) showed that patients with ITC are likely to be symptomatic (95.2%, 95% CI 91.1-99.2) with neck mass (72.2%, 62.2-82.1) as the most common symptom with no laterality preferences (left:right, 46.4%:53.6%). Overall survival (OS) at 15 years was 96.0% (mean OS time:19.7 years; median OS time 18 years). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 15 years was 77.9% (mean RFS time:13.4 years; median RFS time: 17 years). RFS was not affected by symptomatic status (HR: 0.0001, p = 0.96), tumor size (HR; 1.044, p = 0.113), lymph node metastasis (HR: 1.909, p = 0.307), extrathyroidal extension (HR: 0.769, tumor p = 0.688), surgery plus radiotherapy (HR: 0.434, p = 0.207), surgery plus chemoradiotherapy (HR: 0.0001, p = 0.959), subtotal thyroidectomy (HR: 0.821, p = 0.854), lobectomy (HR: 0.366, p = 0.140), lymph node dissection (HR: 1.088, p = 0.888). Surgically treated ITC may have excellent long-term prognosis which seems to be not affected by the extent of resection or use of adjuvant therapy; however, this could be type 2 error; hence more robust evidence is required for definitive conclusions.