Midterm outcomes following revision of failed trapeziectomy with a costochondral autograft.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41934270.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934261436298.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Painful scaphometacarpal impingement after trapeziectomy with or without tendon interposition and ligament reconstruction can be revised with a costochondral autograft. The aim of this retrospective study was to report the outcomes of this surgical procedure. All patients who were operated between 2014 and 2023 were invited for a final follow-up. Patient-reported outcomes, clinical function, radiologic measurements of thumb length and a questionnaire for thoracic donor site morbidity were evaluated. Out of a total of 43 patients (44 thumbs), 35 patients (36 thumbs) were available for follow-up at a mean follow-up of 71 months (SD 32). The median visual analogue scale score for pain at rest improved from 7 (IQR 5 to 9) preoperatively to 1 (IQR 0 to 5) at follow-up. The score during activities of daily life changed from 9 (IQR 8 to 10) to 5 (1 to 8). The mean brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire score was 53 (SD 24) at the time of follow-up. Twenty-one patients rated their results as good and nine rated them as fair. The median Kapandji index was 9 (IQR 9 to 10) with a median key pinch of 3 kg (IQR 2 to 4). After initial improvement radiological thumb length deteriorated over time to preoperative values. Five out of 35 patients complained about chronic pain at the site of cartilage excision between 1 and 5 on the visual analogue scale. We do not recommend a costochondral autograft as the first choice for revision surgery, but it still could be a solution for recurrent problems. IV.