Association of employment quality with depression among sexual and gender minority adults: a retrospective cohort study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41939730.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2026.101462 and PMC identifier 13050029.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people face concerning rates of low-quality employment, unemployment, and depression. Our objective was to center employment in SGM mental health research and assess associations between employment quality and depression. This retrospective study used data from The PRIDE Study-a national, community-engaged, longitudinal cohort of SGM adults in the United States. Employment quality in 2021 was categorized as: standard, secure-income; standard, insecure-income; non-standard, secure-income; non-standard, insecure-income; and unemployed. Mean levels of depressive symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from 2021 to 2023. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used to evaluate the association between employment quality and PHQ-9 scores. Participants' (n = 3354) median age was 34.7 years; 53.1% (n = 1782) were cisgender (sexual minority), 46.9% (n = 1572) transgender and gender diverse (TGD; any sexual orientation), and 91.5% (n = 3070) were white or selected multiple race/ethnicities, including white. Participants occupied standard, secure-income (57.0%; n = 1913); standard, insecure-income (9.3%; n = 313); non-standard, secure-income (12.8%; n = 432); non-standard, insecure-income (14.9%; n = 500); and unemployed (5.9%; n = 196) groups. PHQ-9 scores were highest (<i>i.e.</i>, greater depressive symptoms) among standard, insecure-income; non-standard, insecure-income; and unemployed groups. PHQ-9 scores were higher among TGD workers in all employment quality groups compared to cisgender workers. In adjusted models, workers in standard, insecure-income (difference = 0.98; 95% CI, 0.38-1.58; p = 0.001); non-standard, insecure-income (difference = 1.39; 95% CI, 0.88-1.90; p < 0.001); and unemployed (difference = 3.12; 95% CI, 2.38-3.85; p < 0.001) groups reported higher depressive symptoms compared to the standard, secure-income group. Poorer employment quality was associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms among SGM workers. Dona Rockstad, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.