Intracranial Pressure Treatment Thresholds in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41941228.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.0197 and PMC identifier 13054695.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Intracranial pressure (ICP) is the management focus for improving outcomes after moderate to severe pediatric traumatic brain injury (pTBI). However, contemporary treatment thresholds have limited pediatric specific evidence. To explore ICP thresholds associated with improved functional outcomes in pTBI. This study is a secondary analysis from Studying Trends of AutoRegulation in Severe Head Injury in Pediatrics (STARSHIP) research database, a prospective, multicenter, observational study that enrolled children 16 years and younger requiring invasive arterial and intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring for clinical management of pTBI between July 1, 2018, to March 30, 2023, from 10 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) in the UK and completed data in June 2024. Continuous invasive ICP data during a PICU stay. The primary outcome was 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended for Pediatrics score. ICP dynamics were explored using minute-level ICP calculated from 10-second averages and thresholds tested across 5 to 20 mm Hg. Confounding was addressed using prognostic sliding dichotomy (baseline injury severity) and Pediatric Intensity Level of Therapy score-stratified analyses (treatment intensity). Sensitivity analyses were performed for robustness using propensity score matching, multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression, and marginal structural models. Among the 135 patients included, the median (IQR) age was 96 (26-152) months, and 105 (78%) patients were male. A median (IQR) of 153 (88-275) hours of ICP data were available per patient for 135 patients. Mean (SD) ICP was higher in patients with poor outcome (nonsurvivors vs survivors: 44 [23] mm Hg vs 17 [6] mm Hg; unfavorable vs favorable: 24 [16] mm Hg vs 17 [6] mm Hg). Thresholds of 14 to 15 mm Hg of ICP were identified as most discriminatory for outcome, with an increase in the odds of poor functional outcome at elevations above these levels, using both the static (odds ratio [OR], 6.1; 95% CI, 2.4-15.5; P < .001) and dynamic (dose: OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-9.3; P = .004; duration: OR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.3; P = .007) analyses. Though treatment intensity was not independently associated with outcome or complications, effective ICP control across treatment levels was associated with more favorable prognosis. Sustained ICP greater than 15 mm Hg remained a prognostic factor for poor functional outcome at 12 months, a finding complemented by propensity score matching and causal modeling. In this study, sustained ICP elevations above 14 to 15 mm Hg were associated with poor long-term functional outcomes in pTBI warranting prospective evaluation. These findings suggest that the current treatment threshold of 20 mm Hg maybe too high for pTBI.