Workplace-Based Assessment in Orthopaedic Training: A Commentary on Evolution and Growing Pains.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41947923.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00294 and PMC identifier 13052928.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
While competency-based programmatic assessment systems have become widespread worldwide, there are few comparisons of competence assessment in orthopaedic surgery between countries. In this paper, we provide a narrative overview of current systems in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Ireland, and Australia. We explore what types of workplace-based assessments are used, how many data points are gathered to inform entrustment and progression decisions and whether there is validity evidence using a modified Kane framework. Significant concordance and some variation were found between the programs, and the issues identified are discussed along with the challenges and potential solutions for enhancing competence assessment.