Feasibility and agreement of a self-adhesive EEG electrode set versus conventional EEG in postanoxic coma.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 41967755.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2026.111086.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Electrode application for EEG prognostication in postanoxic coma patients is labor-intensive. We studied the usability of a self-adhesive forehead EEG electrode (Bittium BrainStatus™) and compared the accuracy of background classification with conventional EEG. In 51 postanoxic coma patients, simultaneous monitoring using conventional EEG and a forehead electrode was performed. 5-min EEG fragments were classified according to the ACNS criteria by four experts, based on the conventional montage, the forehead electrode, and a montage based on the standard EEG recording but visualized as the forehead electrode. Forehead electrode recordings were of sufficient quality in 74.1% of fragments. Agreement was moderate for standard EEG versus the forehead electrode (κ: 0.56), and near perfect for conventional EEG versus conventional EEG visualized as the forehead electrode (κ: 0.85). Due to higher noise levels, detection rates of discontinuous and suppressed patterns were reduced. EEG forehead electrode recordings were interpretable in a large proportion of cases. If signal quality is insufficient for assessment, additional standard EEG should be performed to allow definitive assessment. The use of a self-adhesive forehead electrode set has the potential to substantially reduce EEG technician workload in the ICU and suggests considerable potential benefit as a screening-oriented EEG monitoring strategy in postanoxic coma.
Medical subject headings
- Electroencephalography
- Coma