High-Grade 3-Column Osteotomies Are Not Interchangeable: Schwab-Grade-III PSO Versus Schwab-Grade-V VCR in Treating Severe Kyphoscoliosis with an Average 9-Year Follow-up.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42013198.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2106/JBJS.25.01393.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) and vertebral column resection (VCR) are powerful techniques for correcting severe spinal deformities. Although PSO has been proposed as a viable alternative to VCR, their comparative efficacies and safety profiles require further elucidation. This single-center retrospective study analyzed 169 patients (mean age, 22 years; 84 male; 169 ethnic Chinese) with severe kyphoscoliosis who underwent primary corrective surgery via PSO (n = 85) or VCR (n = 84). Radiographic parameters, surgical data, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IOM) changes, Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, and complications were compared between groups. Both techniques significantly improved all radiographic parameters and SRS-22 scores (p < 0.001). The VCR group demonstrated superior correction of the major curve (65.5% versus 56.9%, p = 0.003), segmental kyphosis (68.1% versus 61.5%, p = 0.03), and apical vertebral rotation (48.5% versus 34.4%, p = 0.001). At the critical osteotomy stage, 105 (62.1%) of 169 patients experienced IOM signal decline. The neurological complications rate was significantly higher in the VCR group (13 of 84 versus 7 of 85, p = 0.038), as was the overall complication rate (43 of 84 versus 29 of 85, p = 0.008). Each 1° increase in correction achieved with VCR was associated with a 1.6% higher risk of complications (OR = 1.016, p = 0.045). Although both PSO and VCR were highly effective for major deformity correction, VCR provided a greater magnitude of correction in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. However, this advantage was counterbalanced by a significantly higher risk of complications, including neurological deficits. Despite the frequent reversibility of IOM signal declines, VCR retained a higher risk profile due to its higher overall complication rate. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.