Autonomous driving system based on dual process theory and deliberate practice theory.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42020376.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-72030-6.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Autonomous driving, despite significant progress, is still not widely applied in open, unconstrained environments, primarily owing to deficiencies in hazard perception, few-shot generalization, corner case generalization, and evaluation metrics, resulting in reliability concerns. To address these challenges, we propose CogniDrive, a framework based on dual-process and deliberate practice theories, leveraging contextual reasoning of the Large Language Model (LLM) to enhance driving systems robustness and generalization. Inspired by dual-process theory, CogniDrive comprises two cognition modes: InstinctNav for rapid, intuitive decision-making and ReflectPlan for reflective reasoning. Enhanced by a thought model and experience embedding for LLM, InstinctNav combines behavioral cloning and retrieval augmented generation to enhance few-shot learning efficiency based on deliberate practice theory. ReflectPlan processes and internalizes reward signals embedded in language tokens within the prompt, derived from a self-reflection mechanism, to enable continuous improvement and generalization. To detect hazards in corner cases precluded by limited training data distribution, a vision language model is integrated for comprehensive environmental understanding through multimodal self-reflection. We further propose an evaluation framework that complements traditional metrics by emphasizing safety, comfort, and energy efficiency, and demonstrate state-of-the-art performance through extensive open-loop and closed-loop experiments.