SCORE2-diabetes vs SCORE for evaluation of cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42023381.
- Also identified by DOI 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_663_25 and PMC identifier 13098916.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-SA.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality worldwide, with the risk being exacerbated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Traditionally, the Systematic coronary risk evaluation (SCORE) system has been used to estimate the 10-year risk of fatal cardiovascular events. However, in 2023, the European Society of Cardiology introduced SCORE2-Diabetes, a diabetes-specific model that incorporates disease-related variables. This study aimed to compare the cardiovascular risk estimates from the SCORE and SCORE2-diabetes algorithms in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care, assessing adherence to Low-density Lipoprotein (LDL) therapeutic targets and the impact on cardiovascular risk management. This cross-sectional study evaluated 360 diabetic patients aged 40-65 years in a primary care unit in northern Portugal, comparing the cardiovascular risk estimated by the SCORE and SCORE2-diabetes models. The results showed that the SCORE model classified 95% of patients as high risk and 5% as very high risk, while the SCORE2-diabetes model categorized patients into four groups: 6% low risk, 30% moderate, 57% high, and 7% very high risk. Additionally, 58% of patients did not meet LDL therapeutic targets by SCORE2-Diabetes. The findings suggest that SCORE2-diabetes provides better discrimination of cardiovascular risk, allowing for more personalized treatment. Its integration into clinical systems could optimize decision-making, reduce therapeutic inertia, and improve clinical outcomes in patients with T2DM.