Increased Preactivation and Cocontraction in ACL-Reconstructed Athletes: Insights from AI-Based EMG Analysis.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42044292.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000004010.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears disrupt the neural structures within the ligament, impairing the neuromuscular control of knee-stabilizing muscles. Consequently, muscle activity patterns are a crucial area of research in return-to-sport evaluation after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Artificial intelligence-based methods may help identify and extract meaningful parameters from these patterns. This study aims at accurately and reliably quantifying knee muscle preactivation and timing-based cocontraction indexes (CCIs) in athletes with and without ACL-R during sports-specific landing tasks using an artificial intelligence approach. Eleven athletes with ACL-R and 18 control athletes (CA) performed two landing tasks: single-leg hop and single-leg cross drop landing. EMG signals were recorded bilaterally from four knee-stabilizing muscles: biceps femoris (BF), semitendinosus (ST), vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis. Muscle preactivation onsets before landing and timing-based CCIs were computed through a pretrained deep-learning-based muscle activity detector (LSTM-MAD). To ensure comparability with state-of-the-art approaches, amplitude-based EMG CCIs were also computed. LSTM-MAD estimated muscle preactivation onset with an error under 23 ms compared with manual segmentations by three experts. During single-leg hops, ACL-R athletes exhibited significantly greater BF (ACL-R: -193 ± 12 ms; CA: -152 ± 5 ms; P = 0.002) and ST (ACL-R: -189 ± 11 ms; CA: -140 ± 4 ms; P < 0.001) preactivations and longer cocontraction durations (ACL-R: 69% ± 2%; CA: 54% ± 2%; P < 0.001) compared with CA. During single-leg cross drop landings, ACL-R athletes showed greater BF (ACL-R: -234 ± 25 ms; CA: -150 ± 11 ms; P = 0.02) preactivations and longer BF and ST cocontractions (ACL-R: 55% ± 5%; CA: 35% ± 2%; P = 0.003) compared with CA. At return to sport, ACL-R athletes demonstrated greater BF and ST preactivation and cocontraction during landing tasks. Integrating artificial intelligence-based methods to assess neuromuscular control could improve the effectiveness of rehabilitation protocols, facilitating safer return-to-sport decisions.
Medical subject headings
- Electromyography
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
- Artificial Intelligence
- Muscle, Skeletal
- Muscle Contraction