A commentary on the need for minimum information for studies evaluating biologics in plastic surgery.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42054980.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.04.013.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Biologics including platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are increasingly utilized in plastic surgery for applications ranging from facial rejuvenation to wound healing. However, the literature currently contains heterogeneous reporting that undermines evidence synthesis and clinical application. A recent systematic review found that the vast majority of authors failed to disclose final platelet concentrations, concluding that systematic evaluation is limited by high heterogeneity in preparation protocols.<sup>3</sup> Orthopedic surgery addressed this problem in 2017 by developing the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics (MIBO) guidelines through Delphi consensus, establishing 23 mandatory reporting items across 12 categories. However, voluntary MIBO adoption has been poor, with no improvement in adherence before versus after guideline publication.<sup>5</sup> Plastic surgery has reporting guidelines for stromal vascular fraction (CLINIC-STRA-SVF), leaving PRP and MSCs without standardized reporting requirements. This commentary proposes that plastic surgery journals mandate MIBO checklist completion for all PRP and MSC studies as a condition of publication. Standardized reporting would enable meaningful meta-analyses, allow clinicians to identify optimal protocols, and demonstrate professional commitment to scientific rigor.