Occupational heat stress and the role of wearable cooling interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of physiological and perceptual outcomes.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42055079.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5271/sjweh.4294.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Occupational heat stress, driven by high ambient temperatures, humidity, and radiant heat impairs health, safety, and productivity. Among the interventions for mitigating heat strain, wearable cooling technologies [eg, water/ice, phase-change materials (PCM), ventilated/evaporative garments] is increasingly used, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of wearable cooling intervention on physiological and perceptual outcomes during heat exposure. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42025631559), we searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus (February 2026) for randomized or non-randomized intervention trials among workers or acclimatized adults. Data were extracted as mean/standard deviation (or transformed equivalents) and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Heterogeneity (I2), small-study effects (Egger's test) and sensitivity/subgroup analyses of cooling modalities were performed. Risk of bias (RoB 2, ROBINS-I) and certainty (GRADE) were assessed. Sixty-nine studies were included in our review. Post-exposure, wearable cooling significantly reduced rectal temperature [mean difference (MD) -0.24°C; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.37- -0.1; I<sup>2</sup>=43.91%], gastrointestinal temperature (MD -0.26°C; -0.52- -0.001; I<sup>2</sup>=98.13%), skin temperature (MD -1.14°C; -1.85- -0.42; I<sup>2</sup>=96.56%), and heart rate (MD -7.69 bpm; -11.22- -4.15; I<sup>2</sup>=73.19%). Egger's tests suggested possible small-study effects for skin temperature and heart rate but not for core temperatures. Subgroup analyses indicated more consistent benefits with water/ice and PCM garments. Overall certainty ranged from low to very low due to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision. Wearable cooling attenuates physiological heat strain and improves thermal comfort, particularly via water/ice and PCM systems. Given high heterogeneity and low certainty, adequately powered, standardized, head-to-head trials are needed.