Differences in bleeding outcome capture between electronic health record review using natural language processing and ICD-10 coding in hospitalised children.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42056540.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41390-026-05030-3.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
NLP applied to paediatric EHRs identified substantially more clinically documented bleeding events than ICD-10 coding. Demonstrates considerable loss of clinically assessed bleeding information when relying on administrative datasets alone. Shows that narrative-based ascertainment captures the full spectrum of documented bleeding events not transferred to structured coding. Provides a scalable method for documentation-based bleeding surveillance in hospitalised children. Supports use of NLP to improve outcome ascertainment in research, safety monitoring, and quality registries.