RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): feasibility and family impacts and perspectives of a family-led intervention.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42059456.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2026.2663905.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the feasibility, impacts, and perspectives of a family-led robotic walking intervention. This single-arm interventional study recruited participants aged ≥4 years with neuromotor impairments. Participants were lent a robotic walker and recommended to use at least 150 min/week for 12-weeks. Robotic walking use, acceptability, practicality and adverse events were tracked. Family goals were measured before and after training period using Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Quality of life was examined using EQ-5D-Y, Carer-QoL, and CP-CHILD. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (median (25<sup>th</sup>-75<sup>th</sup> percentile)) and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Qualitative interviews captured family perspectives and were analyzed using thematic analysis. 15 participants aged 4-23 completed this study. Participants trained 5 (3.5-6) times for 150(82-181) minutes and took 7,544(4,640-9,575) steps each week. Adverse events occurred in <1% (16 minor, 1 moderate) of robotic walking sessions. Performance (3.5 (1.9-4.5), <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) and satisfaction (3.3(3.0-5.0), <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001) of goals increased. Parents described positive changes in social experiences and family interactions and difficulties with the logistics of robotic walking. This family-led robotic walking intervention resulted in improvements in individual goals, though families did struggle with some logistics of robotic walking.