Continuity of care and patient-reported experiences in Norwegian general practice: are they linked, and does the measurement of continuity matter?
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42125855.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/fampra/cmag025 and PMC identifier 13168889.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Continuity of care has been associated with improved health and healthcare outcomes. Continuity can be measured using registry-based and patient-reported measures, but how these measures relate to patient-reported experiences is less well understood. The main aim was to assess the association between continuity of care and patient-reported experiences in Norwegian general practice, using registry-based and self-reported measures. A secondary aim was to compare the two continuity measures and examine their agreement. A cross-sectional study was conducted combining data from a national survey of patient-reported experiences with individual-level registry data on general practitioner (GP) consultations. Continuity of care was measured using a self-reported indicator of normally seeing one's own GP and a registry-based Usual Provider of Care (UPC) index. Associations with patient-reported experience scale scores were analysed using adjusted linear regression. Agreement between registry-based and self-reported continuity were examined by comparing their distributions and associations within the same study sample. Both registry-based and self-reported continuity were positively associated with higher patient-reported experience scores across all scales (P < 0.001), with stronger associations for self-reported continuity. Associations were stronger among patients with long-term conditions. Agreement between registry-based and self-reported continuity was moderate and asymmetrical: most patients with high registry-based continuity reported seeing their own GP, whereas patients with low registry-based continuity were almost equally likely to report seeing their own GP or other GPs. The findings underline the importance of continuity of care in general practice. Registry-based and self-reported continuity measures capture related but non-interchangeable aspects of continuity and provide complementary information.
Medical subject headings
- Continuity of Patient Care
- General Practice
- Patient Satisfaction
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures