Distinct electrophysiological profiles of bacterial mechanosensitive channels for sonogenetic actuator selection.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42150595.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1088/1741-2552/ae6f83.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<i>Objective.</i>Sonogenetics combines ultrasound stimulation with genetically encoded mechanosensitive (MS) ion channels for cell-targeted neuromodulation. Actuator choice, however, remains largely empirical because<i>in vivo</i>electrophysiological response signatures are rarely compared under matched conditions. Here, we conducted an exploratory<i>in vivo</i>benchmarking of three bacterial MS channels (MscL-G22S, MscL-G22N, and MscS) during transcranial ultrasound stimulation in anesthetized rat primary visual cortex (V1).<i>Approach.</i>local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded via a microelectrode array from V1 expressing AAV-delivered channels during graded ultrasound stimulation (1 MHz;<i>I</i><sub>spta</sub>100-400 mW cm<sup>-2</sup>). We quantified baseline activity, ultrasound-evoked potentials (UEPs), trial-to-trial response distributions, and frequency-band power dynamics.<i>Main results.</i>Channel identity shaped both baseline and ultrasound-evoked cortical activity. MscS increased baseline LFP total power (∼2.5 dB vs control,<i>P</i>= 0.0035), whereas MscL-G22S shifted baseline band composition (reduced theta, enhanced gamma). MscL-G22S showed the lowest detectable UEP threshold, producing a detectable N1 at 100 mW cm<sup>-2</sup>and an intensity-dependent N1 increase up to ∼2-fold at 400 mW cm<sup>-2</sup>(<i>P</i>< 0.0001). Latency depended on both channel and intensity: MscL-G22N responded faster at low intensity, while MscL-G22S accelerated at higher intensities. MscL expression narrowed trial-to-trial response distributions (bimodal to unimodal). Spectrally, MscL-G22N enhanced theta power, whereas MscL-G22S recruited beta-gamma oscillations at high intensity.<i>Significance.</i>Under matched stimulation and expression conditions, bacterial MscL produced distinct network-level response profiles spanning UEP threshold, response timing, trial-to-trial consistency, and oscillatory modulation. These exploratory benchmarks provide quantitative reference data for comparing sonogenetic actuators and may inform actuator selection for closed-loop neuromodulation.
Medical subject headings
- Ion Channels
- Mechanotransduction, Cellular
- Primary Visual Cortex
- Escherichia coli Proteins
- Ultrasonic Waves