Measuring Radiology's Impact: Core Concepts for Tracking Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Delivering High-Value Care-A Perspective by the ACR's Relevance and Impact Committee.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42201720.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2214/AJR.26.34767.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Radiology strongly impacts patient care. However, radiologists' potential to promote high-value care has long been underappreciated, partly related to difficulties in establishing their role in driving patient-oriented outcomes (e.g., reduced morbidity and mortality; improved quality of life). Recognizing this gap, the American College of Radiology convened the Relevance and Impact Committee to develop a framework for measuring radiologists' impact. The committee proposed two foundational concepts: diagnostic imaging provenance (the lineage underlying a diagnosis being established) and relevance (the manner in which a diagnosis relates to upstream reasons for examinations and downstream decision-making). The committee applied these concepts to develop the medical imaging life cycle framework as a patient and practitioner centric feedback loop whereby each examination serves as a potential care inflection point and pertinent positive and negative findings alter patient trajectories. Advances in data science, including large-scale EHR-driven analyses and generative artificial intelligence, now aid tracking of such relationships, helping to operationalize a longstanding vision of linking imaging to outcomes. This Perspective explores these core concepts and terminology underlying measurement of radiology's impact and seeks to provide a roadmap for their implementation within modern healthcare systems. Such application will promote radiologists' recognition as proximal agents of clinically impactful high-value care.