Temporary carbon dioxide removal to offset short-lived climate forcers.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42203873.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41586-026-10607-3 and PMC identifier 13253319.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Carbon dioxide removal (CDR) is considered for achieving the long-term temperature objectives of the Paris Agreement and national net-zero emission targets<sup>1-5</sup>. The durability of these CDR methods varies widely, ranging from decades to theoretically permanent<sup>6</sup>. Temporary CDR dominates present deployment, whereas permanent solutions face further feasibility and cost challenges at scale<sup>1</sup>. However, efforts to integrate temporary CDR into climate policies have relied on equivalency assumptions between temporary and permanent CDR that contradict physical climate science: temporary CDR cannot fully offset CO<sub>2</sub> emissions as permanent CDR can<sup>6,7</sup>. Here we show that temporary CDR can serve as compensation for non-CO<sub>2</sub> climate forcers, particularly for short-lived species whose compensation ratios are fairly insensitive to the choice of time horizon. For instance, offsetting 1 kg CH<sub>4</sub> requires 498 kg CO<sub>2</sub> with 20-year temporary storage (such as bioplastics) or 101 kg CO<sub>2</sub> with 100-year storage (such as durable wood products). We suggest a critical lifetime threshold separating short-lived and long-lived species for temporary CDR applications, with implementation requiring differentiated reporting of these categories. This framework can provide a physical basis for crediting temporary CDR activities in sectors such as agriculture, in which non-CO<sub>2</sub> emissions dominate and direct emission reductions remain challenging.
Medical subject headings
- Carbon Dioxide