Comparison between three single-dose cardioplegic solutions in myocardial protection: Cardioplegia Trial - a double-blind randomised clinical trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42209207.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-327683.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare myocardial protection afforded by three single-dose cardioplegic solutions - Custodiol (HTK), del Nido (DN) and modified del Nido (MDN) - in adult elective cardiac surgery. Double-blind randomised controlled trial. Tertiary hospital in southern Brazil. 99 adults undergoing elective valve or coronary artery bypass surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Administration of HTK, DN or MDN solution during surgery. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) at 0, 2, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Additionally, indirect measures of myocardial protection were compared, both laboratory and clinical, during intraoperative and postoperative periods. All solutions provided effective myocardial protection, with similar clinical and laboratory outcomes. DN was associated with significantly lower hs-cTnT at 2 hours (p=0.023) and fewer intraoperative transfusions (p=0.008). HTK patients had lower postoperative sodium and potassium levels (p=0.049 and p=0.002, respectively). Survival and major postoperative outcomes, including vasoactive or mechanical support, were similar across groups. The three cardioplegic strategies showed comparable biochemical profiles of myocardial injury. DN was associated with lower early troponin release and reduced transfusion requirements, while HTK produced transient electrolyte shifts. ReBEC; RBR-7g5s66.