Routine data are not 'dirty' data: how to approach using routine data for research.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42215070.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjhci-2025-102018.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The rise of electronic patient records has led to an abundance of routine healthcare data, and the development of NHS Secure Data Environments (SDEs) is transforming their potential for research. However, routine data differ fundamentally from research data; they are generated to support care processes rather than answer predefined research questions. This creates challenges when they are analysed without understanding the context in which they were produced.Using real examples from practice, this paper illustrates the variety of ways routine data can be shaped and how this leads to misinterpretation if treated as merely 'dirty' research data. These examples underpin practical strategies for researchers, including analysis at or by source and working closely with local data providers to understand how a dataset was created.We argue that SDEs must foster strong links between data users and creators to preserve data provenance and support accurate interpretation. By approaching routine data as meaningful records of healthcare processes-rather than flawed research datasets-researchers can fully realise their potential to drive healthcare improvement.
Medical subject headings
- Electronic Health Records
- Health Services Research