Do psychological assessment tools predict spinal cord stimulation treatment outcomes?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42236127.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/rapm-2025-107329.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine whether psychological variables independently predict spinal cord stimulation success or instead moderate pain-response dynamics over time. This retrospective cohort included 217 patients undergoing SCS implantation, with available follow-up in 153 at 6 months and 155 at 12 months. Treatment success was defined as a ≥30% reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain from baseline. Baseline psychological measures included Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) categories (Minimal/Mild/Moderate/Severe), Pain Disability Index (PDI) categories (Low/High), and 10 binary Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) traits. Descriptive analyses, Firth-penalized logistic regression, linear interaction models, partial Spearman correlations, and multivariable linear regression were performed using complete-case data. Available-case success rates were 38.6% at 6 months (59/153) and 30.3% at 12 months (47/155). At 6 months, baseline NRS was borderline associated with categorical success (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.01; p=0.056); BDI, PDI, and PAI traits were not significant. In the 12-month model, most psychological variables were not independently associated with success, although one personality trait 'denial of depression' showed a trend toward lower odds of success (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.09 to 1.11; p=0.074), and age showed a borderline association (p=0.056). In the linear models, the relationship between baseline and follow-up pain appeared strongest in the minimal BDI group and weaker in higher BDI categories. The overall model including these depression-by-pain terms was statistically significant (p=0.005, R²=0.145), though the individual interaction terms did not reach significance. Partial Spearman analysis showed an inverse association between BDI and ΔNRS at 6 months (ρ=-0.199; p=0.023; n=133), but not at 12 months (ρ=-0.060; p=0.493; n=137). Perfectionism and resistance-to-change were associated with smaller 12-month improvement in unadjusted analyses (p=0.0177 and p=0.0378) and remained significant in multivariable modeling (β = -1.195, p=0.010; β = -1.101, p=0.009; R<sup>2</sup>=0.077; p=0.0025). Psychological measures were not strong independent predictors of binary SCS success. Instead, depressive burden influenced early pain-response coupling, while cognitive-rigidity traits were associated with smaller long-term improvement.