Role of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI in Prostate Cancer Recurrence After Prostatectomy.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42242874.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.126.272126.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/CT and pelvic MRI are useful for assessing biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy. We evaluated the role of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI in a 1-stop-shop protocol combining a single injection of <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA, followed by pelvic PET/multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and whole-body PET/CT acquisitions for the detection of recurrent disease. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated 106 consecutive patients referred to our institute for biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy using a 1-stop-shop protocol comprising whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/CT and pelvic <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/mpMRI. Each imaging modality was reviewed in a blinded manner by 2 independent, experienced readers. <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI, with positivity on either MRI or PSMA PET, served as the reference standard. <b>Results:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI detected more local recurrences (<i>n</i> = 52, 49.06%) compared with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/CT (<i>n</i> = 42, 39.62%) and mpMRI (<i>n</i> = 46, 43.00%). Discordant cases accounted for 18 patients (17%): 10% were positive only on MRI and 7% only on PSMA PET. Compared with <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI, both mpMRI and <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET demonstrated similar performance, with sensitivities of 88.5% and 78.8% and specificities of 100% and 98.1%, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>18</sup>F-PSMA PET/MRI outperformed PET/CT and mpMRI in the detection of local recurrences of prostate cancer.