The course of treatment in nonunions of long bones: can we predict when exchange nailing may fail?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42257869.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00590-026-04792-0.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Exchange nailing is often used to treat femoral and tibial nonunions. Its success rate varies with reports of 50-100% success. We sought to determine the trajectory of healing and identify factors associated with the failure of exchange nailing in the treatment of nonunion. This was a retrospective chart review at two level I trauma centers. Patients with aseptic femoral and tibial nonunions treated with exchange nailing were included. The primary outcome was union prior to or at 1 year following treatment. Treatment failure was defined as lack of union (defined as lack of bridging bone on 3 or more cortices) at 1 year or an additional procedure to promote union. 138 patients with aseptic nonunion of tibia or femur fractures initially treated with intramedullary nailing were identified. 77% of patients went on to successful union within 1 year after exchange nailing. The overall union rate was 9.6% at 6 weeks, 36.2% at 3 months, and 67% at 6 months. In femurs, less than 100% cortical contact, diabetes mellitus, and use of bone graft was associated with failure of exchange nailing. On multivariate analysis, only less than 100% cortical contact was associated with an increased risk of failure. No predictors were identified in the tibia. Rates of union were comparable between nonunion at diaphyseal and non-diaphyseal fracture sites, regardless of morphological type. Exchange nailing is a valuable treatment option and may be considered for aseptic nonunions of long bones. Surgeons should consider avoiding this technique when treating femoral nonunions which have less than 100% cortical contact.