Subretinal drusenoid deposits (reticular pseudodrusen) in the general population: a European multicohort study.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42259595.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bjo-2025-329334.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To investigate the prevalence and determinants of subretinal drusenoid deposits (SDDs; also known as reticular pseudodrusen, RPDs) in the European general population. Altogether 18 931 adults from eight population-based studies were included. SDDs/RPDs were determined on optical coherence tomography and/or infrared photography. The prevalence of SDDs/RPDs and associated ocular and systemic determinants using multivariable logistic regression modelling per study and pooled results using random effects meta-analysis were analysed. Mean age ranged from 58.7±10.6 to 88.4±0.0 years in the different studies and prevalence of SDDs/RPDs ranged from 0.6% to 56.0%. Meta-analyses showed that increasing age (OR 1.09 per year, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.13; p<0.001), prevalent early/intermediate and late age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (OR 10.93, 95% CI 5.55 to 21.51; p<0.001 and OR 11.65, 95% CI 4.78 to 28.40; p<0.001, respectively) and AMD genetic risk score (OR 1.21 per unit, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.39; p=0.008) are associated with prevalent SDDs/RPDs. Sex, smoking, education and cardiovascular disease showed borderline association at some cohort levels but not in the meta-analysis. In sensitivity analyses, only age and AMD genetic risk score remained associated with SDDs/RPDs prevalence among participants without any AMD. This multi-cohort analysis emphasises the wide range of SDDs/RPDs prevalence and determinants. Besides age, presence of AMD and AMD genetic risk variants increase the risk of SDDs/RPDs. These cross-sectional findings are compatible with the hypothesis that SDDs/RPDs may not represent a separate disease entity but be an additional sign of retinal pigment epithelium and photoreceptor stress.