How Successful Are Meniscus Repair All-Inside Implants During Deployment?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42263763.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1055/a-2886-8226.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of implants successfully deployed during arthroscopic all-inside meniscal repair. A data query of meniscus repair (CPT codes: 29882 and 29883) procedures was performed at a single institution. The query was limited to include procedures performed between June 1, 2020 and June 1, 2023. Multiple different manufacturer implants were used by 5 sports medicine fellowship trained orthopaedic surgeons. The number of implants successfully used and number of implants wasted due to intra-operative failure during meniscal repair were found on EPIC and documented for each procedure. Success rate of meniscal implants was determined by dividing the number of implants wasted by the total amount of implants used. The query identified 1,026 patients that underwent meniscus repair. From this cohort, 3,867 total meniscal implants were utilized for an average of 3.77 implants per case. Overall, all inside meniscus repair was found to have a low implant failure or waste rate (1.03% [n = 40]). The highest failure rates were found with JuggerStitchTM Curved (9.38%), NOVOSTITCHTM Cartridge 0 Suture (2.44%), and TRUESPANTM 12 Degrees (2.11%) implants. The most important finding was that the overall failure rate of meniscal implants is low. Implants with higher waste rates should be addressed by industry and considered by surgeons when selecting surgical implants. These preliminary findings establish the necessity to further examine implant failure rate and associated costs of meniscus repair.