Patient versus surrogate decision making for life sustaining treatment and terminal care intensity.

Abstract

Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) and Advance Directives (AD) aim to honor patient autonomy. However, the impact of the signatory's identity-whether the patient or a surrogate-on clinical trajectories in the intensive care unit (ICU) remains poorly characterized. To evaluate the association between signatory identity and terminal care intensity and hospitalization costs among adult patients in the ICU. This nationwide population-based cohort study utilized the South Korean National Health Insurance Service database, including 1,189,042 adult ICU admissions between 2020 and 2023. Statistical analyses employed high-dimensional fixed-effects models to account for institutional variability across 417 hospitals. Among 1,189,042 patients, surrogate-determined POLST (SD-POLST) was more than three times as prevalent as patient-determined POLST (PD-POLST). Among 90-day decedents, PD-POLST was associated with significantly reduced odds of invasive terminal care (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.43-0.54). Conversely, SD-POLST more than doubled the odds (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.98-2.35). Notably, even patients with proactive ADs experienced increased care intensity once a surrogate signed the final order (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.51-1.89), indicating a phenomenon of "AD erosion." SD-POLST was also associated with significantly higher daily hospitalization costs (cost ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) compared with no documentation. The clinical efficacy of POLST in limiting non-beneficial care depends fundamentally on the signatory. Surrogate-led decisions were associated with paradoxically higher care intensity and costs, potentially overriding prior patient wishes. These findings highlight the critical importance of early, patient-led discussions to ensure goal-concordant end-of-life care in the ICU.