Absent Cyclin D1 Expression in Myeloid Sarcomas Distinguishes From Malignant Histiocytic Neoplasms: When Morphologic Ambiguity is Deceptive.

Abstract

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a tumor mass involving any extramedullary site composed of myeloid-lineage blasts with myeloid, myelomonocytic, or monocytic differentiation. Distinguishing MS from malignant histiocytic neoplasms (MHNs) is diagnostically challenging due to morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap, particularly for MS with monocytic differentiation, which can mimic MHNs, especially the subtypes of histiocytic sarcoma and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, leading to potential misdiagnosis and inappropriate management. Cyclin D1 overexpression is implicated in MHNs, but its utility in differentiating these entities has not been systematically characterized. We evaluated cyclin D1 immunostaining in 43 MS cases and 30 MHNs. The median age at MS diagnosis was 59 years (range: 0.1 to 90), while the median age at MHN diagnosis was 62 years (range: 9 to 90), with heterogeneous sites of involvement. Cyclin D1 evaluation showed 100% MHNs with strong cyclin D1 positivity in ≥50% tumor cells, compared with 7% MS with weak-to-intermediate positivity in a minor subset of tumor cells. Additional immunohistochemical evaluation showed no difference in PU.1 expression in MHNs (93%) versus MS (84%) but demonstrated a higher proportion of OCT2-positivity in MHNs over MS (52% vs. 23%, P <0.05). Our study demonstrates a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93%) in utilizing cyclin D1 to distinguish MHNs (mature phenotype) from MS (immature phenotype) in diagnostic practice. It is particularly valuable in challenging scenarios of MS with the absence of immature/myeloid lineage-defining markers (MPO, CD34, or CD117) and provides a cost-effective tool to resolve this diagnostic pitfall, ensuring an accurate subclassification.