The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Expert Consensus Document (2026) on Addressing Definition and Practices of Sublobar Resection in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
expert_opinion · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42320552.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2026.06.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Two recent randomized clinical trials have shown sublobar resection to be noninferior to lobectomy in node-negative non-small cell lung cancer ≤2 cm. As a result, the use of sublobar resection in early lung cancer patients has significantly increased. Consensus recommendations are needed to guide its appropriate use. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Evidence-Based Surgery assembled a panel of thoracic surgeons with clinical and methodological expertise to review the existing literature on this topic. A modified Delphi method, with boundaries and thresholds determined a priori, was used until 75% agreement on the statements was reached. The panel identified 7 key areas of controversy. Three rounds of voting were required to reach >75% agreement on 21 statements to help guide appropriate use of sublobar resection in early-stage lung cancer. Despite results of recent randomized clinical trials, several key questions remain regarding sublobar resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. These statements will provide further guidance for clinicians considering the different surgical options.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Lung Neoplasms
- Pneumonectomy