Durable mid-term survivorship after proximal ACL repair with suture augmentation in a middle-aged cohort: A risk factor analysis.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42339021.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jeo2.70815 and PMC identifier 13285580.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears with suture augmentation (SA) provides a ligament-preserving alternative to reconstruction. Evidence on mid-term durability and associated risk factors for revision remains limited. This study evaluated revision-free survival at a minimum follow-up of 72 months and identified risk factors for revision. A consecutive cohort undergoing arthroscopic proximal ACL repair with SA, performed by a single surgeon between 2017 and 2019, was analysed. Revision-free survival was determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk factors were evaluated using parametric or non-parametric tests; significance was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. A minimum follow-up of 72 months (median 79, interquartile range [IQR] 75-97) was completed by 80 patients (23 males; mean age 42 ± 13 years). Revision surgery was required in 13 patients (16%) after a median of 38 months, including six re-ruptures and seven chronic instabilities. Revision-free survival was 94% at 1 year, 88% at 5 years and 83% at 7 years. Age, body mass index (BMI), sex, surgical timing, meniscal or ligamentous injury and physiotherapy duration showed no significant associations. Arthroscopic proximal ACL repair with SA demonstrated durable survivorship exceeding 80% at 7 years. While preoperative Tegner score showed an exploratory association with revision risk, no independent predictor of failure was confirmed. These findings support proximal ACL repair with SA as a ligament-preserving option for carefully selected patients, particularly in middle-aged individuals with moderate mechanical demand. Generalizability to younger, high-demand athletes requires further prospective evidence. Level III, retrospective cohort study.