STAT-C, an innovative training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders: A case study for spontaneous scaling in primary care.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42348516.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0351937 and PMC identifier 13298746.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Scaling primary care innovations to benefit broader populations is a key priority for decision-makers. While the science of effective scaling evolves, little is known about innovations that scale spontaneously, i.e., without deliberate guidance. To assess the spontaneous scaling process of STAT-C, a training workshop supporting management of sick leave related to common mental health disorders, and its perceived effects on primary care services and beneficiaries. We conducted a mixed-methods descriptive single-case study using an Integrated Knowledge Translation (iKT) approach involving patient users. The case was defined as the spontaneous scaling of STAT-C, presented at the Quebec College of Family Physicians' Innovation Symposium and assessed using a selection criteria checklist. Over one year, we observed the scaling process through monthly meetings with the innovation team and collected documents to retrace key steps. We conducted interviews with decision-makers, healthcare professionals, and end-users, along with a focus group with the innovation team. Data were analyzed thematically using documents, interviews, and meetings. The scaling process was examined using the Scaling Impact principles: justification, optimal scale, coordination, and dynamic evaluation. STAT-C met 71% of selection criteria. Fourteen participants were interviewed: innovation team (n = 2), healthcare professionals (n = 5), decision-makers (n = 4), and end-users (n = 3). Technical justifications included the need to standardize information across professionals (n = 10), while moral ones emphasized alignment with patient values (n = 8). Interviews revealed limited awareness of dynamic evaluation and a lack of indicators supporting further scaling. Ethical rationales reflected goal-oriented and duty-based reasoning. Preliminary data suggested improvements in healthcare professionals' self-reported competence in managing CMHD-related sick leave, offering early indications of the innovation's relevance. This study highlights strategies, challenges, and outcomes of spontaneous scaling under real-world conditions, showing how pathways emerge, strategies evolve, and ethical dimensions shape decision-making.
Medical subject headings
- Primary Health Care
- Mental Disorders
- Sick Leave