Optimising prescription for metastatic breast cancer patients through a three-level submaximal exercise test protocol.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42349471.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1080/09638288.2026.2692847.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Exercise prescription in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) requires individualised assessment to maximise effectiveness and safety. This study examined feasibility of a three-level submaximal exercise test protocol to assess physical capacity in MBC. This cross-sectional study (<i>N</i> = 70) assessed physical capacity in women with MBC using a multi-stage treadmill test, 30-second sit-to-stand (30STS), and a 120-second adapted burpees test, performed consecutively if progression criteria were met. Heart rate (HR) and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) were recorded. Secondary outcomes included cancer-related fatigue (CRF) and upper- and lower-limb functionality (ULFI and LLFI). Sixty-four participants completed the multi-stage treadmill test, 70 completed the 30STS, and 5 (those meeting progression criteria) performed adapted burpees. HR and RPE increased progressively with exercise intensity, with highest values during adapted burpees. Women reported low-to-moderate levels of CRF (mean PFS-R: 4.5, standard deviation [SD]: 2.5) and moderate-to-high upper- and lower-limb functionality (mean ULFI: 70.8%, SD: 20.3; LLFI: 68.4%,SD: 26.4). Multi-level physical capacity testing appears feasible in MBC, particularly at submaximal levels, although higher-intensity tests may be limited to a small subset when using progression criteria and highlight importance of individualisation. Incorporating self-reported measures may enhance the comprehensive evaluation of patient function and limitations.