Endovascular treatment and outcome in patients with CTP-defined extra-large infarct core stroke.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42350109.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/jnis-2026-025528.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Evidence for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with very large perfusion-defined infarct core stroke remains limited. We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study using prospectively maintained stroke registries from nine comprehensive stroke centers in China between 1 June, 2019 and 1 June, 2025. Adults with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion involving the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery M1/M2 segment, presentation within 24 hours, and baseline CT perfusion (CTP)-defined ischemic core volume ≥100 mL were included. Ischemic core was defined as relative cerebral blood flow of <30%. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3. Multivariable regression and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW) were used. Among 327 patients (median age 74 years; 146 women), 203 underwent EVT and 124 received best medical management. Successful reperfusion was achieved in 181/203 EVT-treated patients (89.1%). EVT was associated with higher odds of a favorable functional outcome (19.7% vs 5.6%; adjusted OR (aOR) 4.3, 95% CI 1.6 to 11.6, P=0.004; IPTW aOR 5.1, 95% CI 2.1 to 12.3, P<0.001 lower 90-day mortality (49.3% vs 70.2%; aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.8, P=0.009), and a higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (25.6% vs 8.1%; aOR 4.4, 95% CI 2.0 to 9.8, P<0.001). In this multicenter cohort of patients with anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion and CTP-defined ischemic core volume of ≥100 mL, EVT was associated with a better functional outcome and lower mortality, but a favorable outcome remained uncommon and mortality remained high, with an increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Prospective validation is needed.