Bonding character and octahedral geometry as key determinants of solute miscibility in Ir-based oxides.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42380123.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1038/s41467-026-75036-2.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The miscibility between two oxides can be estimated using the Hume-Rothery criteria, which consider crystal structure, ionic radius, and cation valence. However, rutile-based IrO<sub>2</sub>-TiO<sub>2</sub> and IrO<sub>2</sub>-SnO<sub>2</sub> systems show unexpectedly limited miscibility despite fully satisfying these criteria. This puzzling phenomenon has not been explained since their phase diagrams were first reported in 1967. Here we find that d<sup>0</sup> and d<sup>10</sup> M cations (such as 3d<sup>0</sup> Ti<sup>4+</sup> and 4d<sup>10</sup> Sn<sup>4+</sup>) form primarily ionic M-O bonds due to the lack of overlap between their d states and O 2p states, while Ir-O bonds in IrO<sub>2</sub> exhibit highly covalent bonding characteristics. Consequently, these two distinct bonding types at a shared oxygen site in the edge-sharing rutile structure lead to geometrically frustrated electron density localization, resulting in the immiscibility of M in IrO<sub>2</sub>. However, this frustration is significantly alleviated when the bonds meet in a corner-sharing octahedral geometry with a nearly linear Ir-O-M configuration. Complete solid solutions across the entire composition range can thus be achieved in cubic-perovskite-based Ir oxides with exclusively corner-sharing octahedral geometry. Our findings highlight the crucial role of bonding characteristics and octahedral geometries in determining oxide miscibility.