Addressing Moral Distress Among Gender-Affirming Healthcare Professionals.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42380554.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s11606-026-10583-4.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Escalating federal and state policy actions have systematically targeted transgender and gender-diverse individuals, aiming to restrict access to gender-affirming care, particularly for youth. These measures, accompanied by legal and financial threats against providers and institutions, have undermined healthcare professionals' ability to deliver this care. As a result, gender-affirming healthcare professionals are experiencing significant moral distress: the psychological conflict arising when clinicians know what they ought to do morally but are prevented from doing so by external constraints. Drawing on parallels in abortion care post-Dobbs, this perspective examines how moral distress, safety concerns, and legal threats contribute to worsened well-being, increased stress, and heightened risk of burnout among providers, all of which jeopardize patient care. This piece then provides a multi-level framework of strategies to mitigate moral distress and concludes by underscoring the need to protect the rights of both patients and providers as essential to preserving access to gender-affirming care.