Modeling Dyadic Interdependence in Endocrine Functioning: A Multilevel Machine Learning Study of Adults with Cancer and Their Caregivers.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42406657.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1109/TBME.2026.3710661.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study evaluated dyadic endocrine interdependence among cancer patients and their spousal caregivers using a machine learning (ML) framework that assesses how partner-level information improves prediction of individual stress biomarker responses. A multilevel ML framework was applied to 149 patient-caregiver dyads. Predictive performance was evaluated for mean and variability of diurnal slopes for cortisol, alpha-amylase, and DHEAS. Five regression models were compared across eight configurations incorporating PCA, correlation-based filtering, and data augmentation via leave-one-out cross-validation. Incremental dyadic signals were quantified via partial Spearman correlation, and predictor importance redistribution was characterized using SHAP-based decomposition. Nonlinear methods (Extra Trees, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Regression) yielded top-performing models for 11 of 12 outcomes with at least one significant model at 95% confidence ($\rho$ = 21.1% to 50.6%). For slope mean outcomes, targeted preprocessing converted negative or near-zero baseline correlations into significant predictions. Partner signal significance was biomarker-specific: at 90% confidence, mean outcome partner signals were significant for cortisol and DHEAS (8 of 11 models) but negligible for alpha-amylase (1 of 10), whereas variability partner signals were distributed across all three biomarkers (8 of 22 models). SHAP analysis revealed two structural signatures: mean outcomes showed an incremental magnitude pattern (AUC-ROC = 0.91), indicating a unidirectional predictive partner signal, whereas variability outcomes exhibited bilateral convergence (AUC-ROC = 0.90), indicating patterns consistent with interpersonal processes. Dyadic interdependence in endocrine regulation manifests through distinct structural signatures for mean versus variability measures. This analytic framework offers a hypothesis-generating approach to identifying psychobiological pathways for improving health in oncology populations.