Prognostic Value of T2-FLAIR Hyperintense Vessel Sign for Cerebral Hyperperfusion Syndrome and Feasibility of Risk-Stratified Perioperative Management Following Carotid Artery Stenting.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42419562.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2026.125187.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the prognostic performance of preoperative T2-FLAIR hyperintense vessel sign (HVS) grading for cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS) after carotid artery stenting (CAS), and to evaluate the clinical feasibility and safety of an HVS-guided risk-stratified perioperative management strategy. A single-center prospective cohort study was conducted on 128 consecutive patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥70 who underwent elective CAS. All participants were categorized into three groups based on preoperative HVS grades: low-risk (HVS 0-1), intermediate-risk (HVS 2), and high-risk (HVS 3). Tailored interventions, including session-based staged angioplasty and tiered systolic blood pressure control, were implemented across all groups. The primary clinical endpoint was 30-day symptomatic CHS. Firth penalized logistic regression was applied for exploratory analysis of factors associated with CHS occurrence. The overall 30-day incidence of symptomatic CHS was 6.3%, with a stepwise rising risk across low-risk (0%), intermediate-risk (5.3%) and high-risk (24%) HVS subgroups (P<0.001). Exploratory regression analysis revealed that HVS grade ≥2 (OR=6.87, 95%CI: 2.91-16.23, P<0.001) and incomplete circle of Willis (OR=3.72, 95%CI: 1.58-8.76, P=0.003) were correlated with higher CHS odds. There were no intergroup differences in total procedural complications, and the CHS incidence of our cohort was numerically lower than that of a historical control group. Preoperative T2-FLAIR HVS grading serves as a reliable prognostic marker for stratifying CHS risk in patients receiving CAS. The HVS-guided risk-stratified perioperative management protocol is clinically feasible and safe. As a widely accessible imaging indicator, HVS has promising application value in routine clinical practice. Further large-scale multicenter studies are warranted to validate our findings.