Do Surgical Setbacks Shape Surgical Judgment? Exploring the Psychological and Cognitive Effects of Complications on Neurosurgeons.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42431366.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2026.125182.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Neurosurgery carries one of the highest complication-associated morbidity burdens of any surgical specialty. While patient-facing consequences of adverse events are well documented, the psychological, professional, and financial impact on the operating neurosurgeon, the "second victim," remains poorly characterized, limiting the development of evidence-based support frameworks. To examine the psychological and behavioral sequelae experienced by neurosurgeons following major surgical complications and to identify unmet institutional support needs. A cross-sectional anonymous online survey was distributed to neurosurgeons across varied practice settings and career stages across Pakistan. Domains included complication exposure, emotional impact, confidence changes, decision-making modifications, Morbidity and Mortality conference participation, support received, financial consequences, medicolegal concern, and preferred support modalities. Descriptive statistics were applied. Eighty-one neurosurgeons participated. Major complications were reported by 96%; neurological deficit and postoperative infection were most common, 62% each. Over 63% rated emotional impact at 4 or 5 out of 5, and 73% reported a post-complication decline in surgical confidence. Fear or hesitation in managing similar cases affected 72%. 86% modified their decision-making through increased conservatism, defensive documentation, and greater second-opinion seeking yet 77.8% received no formal support. Financial consequences affected 27.2%, and 75.3% perceived inadequate institutional financial protection. Surgical complications impose a substantial multidimensional burden on neurosurgeons, encompassing emotional distress, confidence erosion, and financial strain. The near-universal absence of formal support represents a critical institutional gap. Structured peer support, reflective debriefing, and financial protection mechanisms should be systematically integrated into neurosurgical practice.