Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness (NEXIS) trial: randomized trial of combined in-bed cycling and intravenous amino acid plus usual care.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42438140.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/ajrccm/aamag287.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) in intensive care units (ICUs) often experience immobility and limited nutritional intake, with long-lasting impairments. Evaluate whether combined in-bed cycling exercise and intravenous amino acid, initiated early in the ICU, improves physical functioning. This multicenter phase 2 trial randomly allocated patients 1:1 to protocolized in-bed cycling (45 min/d) plus intravenous amino acid (total protein intake: 2.0-2.5 g/kg/d) plus usual care vs usual care alone. Blinded assessment of 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) at hospital discharge was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included functional measures at ICU and hospital discharge, along with phone surveys at the 6-month follow-up. Patients were analyzed according to intention to treat. The planned sample size was 128 evaluable patients (64 per arm). In total, 115 patients (median age ∼55 years, 55% male, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II ∼24, >90% mechanically ventilated) were randomized (60 intervention; 55 control). Enrollment was stopped early due to slow recruitment, with no evidence of safety concerns. The mean duration of cycling was 40 ± 7 min/d (control: 0 min/d), with total protein intake of 1.9 ± 0.6 g/kg/d (control: 0.9 ± 0.6). The median (interquartile range) 6MWD was similar between intervention and control: 108 (15-242) and 95 (0-196) m (P = .51) (median difference, 10; 95% CI, -75 to 84). Secondary outcomes were also similar between groups. Among patients with ARF, a combined intervention of early in-bed cycling and amino acid supplementation appeared safe but did not improve 6MWD or secondary outcomes during hospitalization or 6-month follow-up. Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03021902).