Dose-escalated versus Standard Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: 9-year Results of a Randomized Phase 2 Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42456783.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.07.004.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare the safety and efficacy of preoperative simultaneous integrated boost chemoradiotherapy (SIB-CRT) versus standard chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). This prospective, randomized phase II trial (NCT02195141) enrolled patients with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CRT (50 Gy/25 fx to pelvis) or SIB-CRT (50 Gy/25 fx to the pelvis with SIB of 56 Gy to PGTV and 60 Gy to lateral metastatic nodes if present). Radical surgery was planned 6-8 weeks after chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate; secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), local control (LC), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and toxicity. From August 2013 to February 2015, 106 patients were enrolled: 55 in the SIB-CRT group and 51 in the CRT group. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 14.5% (SIB-CRT) and 19.6% (CRT) of patients, primarily manifested as radiation dermatitis. Curative treatment (radical surgery or watch-and-wait) was achieved in 89.1% (49/55) of SIB-CRT patients and 78.4% (40/51) of CRT patients (P=0.135). After a median follow-up of 116.6 months, the SIB-CRT group showed superior 9-year outcomes in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population: DFS (70.8% vs 47.4%; HR 0.46, P=0.013), OS (74.3% vs 48.9%; HR 0.43, P=0.008), MFS (70.8% vs 47.2%; HR 0.48, P=0.017), LC (87.1% vs 70.1%; HR 0.40, P=0.038) and CSS (77.4% vs 57.2%; P=0.027). Similar benefits were observed in the curative treatment cohort. The pCR rates were comparable (15.2% vs 18.4%; P=0.695). Exploratory subgroup analysis showed that the survival benefit of SIB-CRT was statistically significant in patients who did not receive perioperative chemotherapy (9-year DFS: 70.8%; HR=0.343, P = .014), whereas no additional benefit was observed in those receiving chemotherapy. Dose escalation through SIB during neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy translates into superior long-term survival outcomes. Despite comparable pCR rates, the intensified control of both local disease and micrometastases by SIB-CRT, coupled with its significant superiority within the chemotherapy-naive subgroup, likely contributed to these robust results. These findings establish dose escalation as a potent strategy for optimizing long-term cure in the modern management of LARC, particularly in chemotherapy-ineligible patients.