Prices and cost drivers of alternatives to animal-source foods: a scoping review and narrative analysis.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42468543.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.lanplh.2026.101485.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This Review examines the pricing and cost drivers of alternatives to animal-source foods (Alt-ASFs). Through systematic searches, we identified 76 eligible studies. Traditional, unprocessed or minimally processed plant-based foods, such as legumes, are relatively low cost across contexts. However, most other Alt-ASFs are not cost-competitive with conventional animal products. Plant-based dairy and meat analogues come closest to price parity with their animal-based equivalents, with average price ratios of 1·81-2·04, while insect prices vary widely by product type and context. Projected cell-based meat prices range from slightly lower to several times higher than conventional meat prices. Research shows a strong geographical bias towards high-income western countries, with less coverage of low-income and middle-income regions except for traditional insect-based foods. Promoting legumes and related plant-based foods, such as tofu, could offer a viable approach to reducing animal-source food consumption in high-consumption settings without requiring further price reductions. However, scaling other Alt-ASFs will require substantial cost reductions through technological advances, particularly for cell-based and algae-based products, or policy-level approaches, such as subsidy reform, true-cost pricing, or carbon taxes.