Midcarpal fusion: Complications and outcomes of endomedullary screws technique with three techniques: Four-corner, luno-capitate and bicolumnar fusion. Case series.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42470976.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2026.06.025.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We report the clinical and radiographic outcomes, and complications of midcarpal fusions, four corner fusion (4CF), bicolumnar (BC) and luno-capitate (LC), with a focus on endomedullary screw fixation. Between 2018 and 2024, 38 patients underwent three distinct types of midcarpal fusions: 20 underwent 4CF, 6 underwent BC and 12 underwent LC. Postoperative evaluation was conducted using X-ray and computed tomography scans to assess the degree of fusion, correction of the lunate and capitate bones, presence of possible screw prominences and secondary radio-carpal degeneration. Twenty-six patients exhibited favourable outcomes, whereas 12 were reoperated: 3 cases were converted to total wrist fusion owing to screw migration in non-union, 4 cases for screw removal alone due to screw migration and the others for revision of the arthrodesis site. In 13 cases, a loss of reduction of the semilunar bone with consequent DISI was identified and was sometimes associated with a reduction in wrist extension. Intramedullary screws have low intrinsic stability. Immobilisation is recommended for at least 6 weeks with caution during mobilisation to avoid stress on the healing site, minimise the risk of screw migration and loss of lunate reduction. Although DISI alone does not constitute a reason for surgical revision, it has the potential to limit wrist extension. In some cases, fusion may not be achieved; however, this does not necessarily constitute a problem. It is also advisable to use shorter screws, to avoid subchondral placement, owing to the possibility of secondary migration. IV.