GENERALIZABILITY OF DEEP LEARNING MODELS FOR REFERABLE DIABETIC RETINOPATHY DETECTION: A CROSS-POPULATION STUDY.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42479603.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004924.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate cross-population performance of deep learning models for referable diabetic retinopathy (DR) detection and assess whether inclusion of local data improves robustness in a Turkish external validation setting. Global datasets (DDR, IDRiD, Messidor) and a Turkish real-world clinical dataset were used. Images were re-graded by three ophthalmologists and binarized as referable/non-referable DR. Five architectures were evaluated: EfficientNet-B0, EfficientNet-V2, ResNet50, ConvNeXt-V2-Tiny, and Swin V2 CR Small. Models were tested under three settings: Global Train-Global Test, Global Train-Local Test, and Mixed Train-Mixed Test. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, ROC-AUC, and PR-AUC; Grad-CAM was used for explainability. The global training set included 9,881 images; two external test sets (2,042 images each) were used. Inter-grader agreement was high (ICC[3,1]=0.84; ICC[3,k]=0.96). Swin V2 CR Small achieved the highest performance in Global Train-Global Test (accuracy 0.938; ROC-AUC 0.985). Performance declined in Global Train-Local Test, where ConvNeXt-V2-Tiny performed best (accuracy 0.823; sensitivity 0.940; ROC-AUC 0.913). In Mixed Train-Mixed Test, ConvNeXt-V2-Tiny remained the most balanced model (accuracy 0.823; sensitivity 0.939; NPV 0.948; ROC-AUC 0.875). Models performed strongly under matched conditions but degraded across populations. ConvNeXt-V2-Tiny showed the most stable screening performance, supporting the need for local validation before deployment.