Prehospital pelvic binder use and transfusion requirements in patients with pelvic fractures: A nationwide propensity-matched cohort study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42480287.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2026.113501.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Pelvic binders are recommended for suspected pelvic fractures to provide early stabilization and hemorrhage control, but robust comparative evidence regarding their real-world impact on transfusion requirements and subsequent hemorrhage-control strategies remains limited. We evaluated the association between prehospital pelvic binder use, early transfusion requirements, and pelvic angioembolization in a nationwide trauma registry. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Japan Trauma Data Bank from 2019 to 2023. Adult patients with blunt pelvic fractures were included. One-to-three propensity score matching was used to adjust for confounding by indication. The primary outcome was 24-hour red blood cell transfusion volume. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality and hemorrhage-control interventions, particularly pelvic angioembolization. Multivariable regression analyses and mixed-effects models were used to assess associations between prehospital pelvic binder use and outcomes. Among 10,332 eligible patients, 182 patients (1.8%) received a prehospital pelvic binder. After matching, 182 patients with prehospital pelvic binder use and 546 controls were analyzed. Median 24-hour red blood cell transfusion volume did not differ significantly between groups (2.0 [interquartile range, 0.0-10.0] vs. 0.0 [0.0-8.0] units; P = 0.486), and regression analyses showed no independent association between prehospital pelvic binder use and transfusion volume. In-hospital mortality was similar between groups. In contrast, prehospital pelvic binder use was associated with a higher rate of pelvic angioembolization (33.0% vs. 21.2%; odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.66; P = 0.002). Subgroup analyses, including patients with acetabular and proximal femur fractures, showed no evidence of effect modification. In this nationwide propensity-matched cohort of patients with blunt pelvic fractures, prehospital pelvic binder use was not associated with reduced 24-hour transfusion requirements or in-hospital mortality, but was associated with a higher rate of pelvic angioembolization. These findings suggest that prehospital pelvic binder use may influence, or reflect differences in, subsequent hemorrhage-control strategies rather than directly reducing transfusion requirements.