Maternalism in Palliative Care: A Case for Relational Autonomy and Informed Non-Dissent.
Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42493480.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/10966218261472561.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Clinicians often face situations in which patients or families desire aggressive care that medical teams believe offers no meaningful benefit. Traditional shared decision-making frameworks may inadequately address these tensions. A 53-year-old woman with metastatic lung cancer desired full resuscitation despite progressive multisystem organ failure. She identified as a "fighter" but faced a clinical dilemma: adequate pain control required accepting respiratory compromise. We apply the bioethical construct of maternalism, integrating relational autonomy and informed non-dissent to support clinician-guided decision making that preserves patient values while unburdening families from impossible choices. Maternalism offers palliative care clinicians a theoretically grounded approach for navigating value-laden decisions when patients cannot or choose not to bear the weight of deciding.