Impact of Sentinel Node Omission in Early-Stage Breast Cancers on Adjuvant Therapy Decision-Making.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42493714.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1245/s10434-026-20145-x.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that selective omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early-stage breast cancer may reduce morbidity without compromising oncologic outcomes. The impact of SLNB omission on eligibility for adjuvant therapies, including CDK4/6 inhibitors and partial breast irradiation (PBI), remains unclear, as both depend on nodal status. Using a single-institution registry (2012-2024), we identified women with cT1N0, ER+/HER2-, grade 1-2 breast cancer who would have been candidates for SLNB omission. Pathologic nodal status and eligibility for CDK4/6 inhibitors and PBI were assessed. Among 1,194 patients, 130 (10.9%) had ≥1 positive sentinel lymph nodes, including five (0.4%) with ≥4 positive nodes. Nodal positivity decreased with age (18% <50 years vs. 7.4% ≥70 years (p < 0.001). Nodal positivity increased with tumor size (6.2% (cT1a), 6.6% (cT1b), 14.4% (cT1c); p < 0.001) and with tumor grade (8.5% (grade 1) vs. 12.4% (grade 2); p = 0.03). In women aged 50-59 years with cT1a/b tumors, nodal positivity did not differ by grade (6.8% grade 1 vs. 11.1% grade 2; p = 0.43). In women aged ≥60 years with cT1a/b tumors, rates were 3.1 and 2.1%, respectively (p = 1.00). Under current guidelines, SLNB omission would have excluded 18% of women <50 and 8.8% of women ≥50 from consideration for CDK4/6 inhibitors and PBI. Sentinel lymph node biopsy omission is unlikely to affect adjuvant treatment selection in carefully selected older women with small, low-grade tumors, particularly those aged ≥60 years with grade 1 cT1a/b disease, in whom occult nodal positivity was only 2.1%. In contrast, younger patients, those with cT1c tumors, and those with higher-grade disease demonstrated substantially higher rates of nodal involvement, suggesting that SLNB continues to provide clinically actionable information that may influence eligibility for CDK4/6 inhibitors and partial breast irradiation. These findings support a risk-adapted rather than universal approach to SLNB omission.