Knee ligament reconstruction reinforced with FiberTape®: Versatility in indications and safety profile of 381 cases with a mean follow up of 8 years.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42497503.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2026.104571.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Suture tape reinforcement of knee ligament reconstruction differs from graft augmentation as a concept in technique and biomechanics. The former allows independent loading of the graft and a stronger construct. The purpose of this study was to report the clinical outcomes and complications rate of a large series of knee ligament reconstructions reinforced with a high-strength suture tape. A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained single-centre knee ligament surgery database that includes 1685 cases performed between March 2011 to June 2022 was conducted. Three hundred and eighty-one cases that underwent ligament reconstruction with ultra-high-strength suture tape reinforcement were included in the study and categorized into three groups: Group I - cases of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); Group II - cases of multi-ligament knee injuries with ACL involvement, where reconstruction/repair was performed for all the injured structures; Group III - isolated ligament reconstruction cases or multi-ligament injuries with no ACL involvement. Patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively. Objective knee stability testing with KT-1000 arthrometer was reported. Range of motion and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome (KOOS) score, Lysholm score and Tegner activity score, were reported. All complications and their treatments were reported. A total of 381 cases of primary ligament reconstruction, where one or more ligament was reinforced with high-strength suture tape were included. Group I ACL (n = 234), Group II Multi-ACL (n = 92), Group III Other-Ligament(s) (n = 55). The total mean age was 30.5 ± 12.3 years, 64.6% were males and 35.4% females. The mean follow up for all cases was 8 ± 2.8 years (range 7.7-8.3). Subjective knee stability with KT-1000 arthrometer demonstrated significant postoperative improvements across all groups (all P < 0.05). The side-to-side difference at 2 years in Group I was 1.7 ± 3.3 mm (P = 0.03), in Group II was 1.1 ± 3.2 mm (P = 0.04), while Group III exhibited a side-to-side difference of 1 ± 3.6 mm (P < 0.001), indicating that anteroposterior stability had been restored in all groups There was significant clinical improvement across all PROMs from preoperative to the 24 months postoperative mark (all P < 0.05). Overall complications were reported in 3.7% (n = 14/381) of the cases, including 2.1% (n = 5/234) ACL re-rupture rate. No other ligament re-rupture was reported. Knee ligament reconstruction with high-strength suture tape reinforcement yields a safe graft-suture construct that translates into favourable clinical outcomes for both intra-articular and extra-articular ligament surgery, with a very low complication rate including a low graft rupture rate.