The effect of squat training with different eccentric contraction tempos on lower limb muscle strength.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42507730.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0354725 and PMC identifier 13405063.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the impact of 8-week squat training with different eccentric contraction tempos on maximal squat strength, jump height, and sprint performance among university students majoring in sports training. METHODS: Thirty participants were randomly assigned to either the 4/0/X/0 group, the 2/0/X/0, or the self-selected eccentric, isometric and inter-repetition tempo group (V/V/X/V), performing tempo-specific loaded squat training twice weekly for 8 weeks. Maximal squat strength, 30-meter sprint performance, countermovement jump (CMJ), and squat jump (SJ) heights were assessed before and after the intervention. A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA and effect size analysis were used to evaluate the training outcomes. RESULTS: 1) For maximal squat strength, no statistically significant inter-group difference was detected (P > 0.05). All three groups exhibited significant within-group improvements relative to baseline (P < 0.05 to P < 0.01). Descriptive effect size analysis showed the magnitude of improvement ranked as follows: 2/0/X/0 group (ES = 1.45)> V/V/X/V group (ES = 0.85)> 4/0/X/0 group (ES = 0.64). 2) For CMJ height, both the 2/0/X/0 and V/V/X/V groups showed significant improvement compared to pre-intervention (P < 0.05), while the 4/0/X/0 group exhibited a significant decrease (P < 0.01). ES magnitudes followed the order: 2/0/X/0 group (ES = 1.07) > V/V/X/V group (ES = 0.30) > 4/0/X/0 group (ES = -0.90). 3) SJ height results mirrored CMJ trends, with ES values ranking:2/0/X/0 group (ES = 1.09) > V/V/X/V group (ES = 0.34) > 4/0/X/0 group (ES = -0.83). 4) In 30-meter sprint performance, the 2/0/X/0 group demonstrated significant improvement (P < 0.05), the 4/0/X/0 group showed significant decline (P < 0.01), and the V/V/X/V group exhibited no significant change. Effect sizes indicated significant improvement in the 2/0/X/0 group (ES = -0.76), no meaningful change in the V/V/X/V group (ES = -0.10), and a significant decline in the 4/0/X/0 group (ES = 0.63). Notably, despite significant gains in maximal strength, the 4/0/X/0 group displayed concurrent decrements in stretch-shortening cycle-based explosive performances. CONCLUSION: Compared with the 4/0/X/0 and V/V/X/V tempos, the 2/0/X/0 tempo showed the most favorable improvement trend in lower-limb maximal strength, and induced significantly greater enhancements in explosive power performance.
Medical subject headings
- Muscle Strength
- Lower Extremity
- Resistance Training
- Muscle Contraction
- Muscle, Skeletal