AI-Assisted Risk Stratification in Stage II Colorectal Cancer: Multi-Institutional Validation of Semantically-Enhanced Deep Learning.
other
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 42521098.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2026.07.009.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Accurate risk stratification in stage II colorectal cancer is essential for treatment decision-making, as current guidelines recommend adjuvant chemotherapy only for patients with a high-risk of relapse. We aimed to develop and validate an AI-based approach for automated invasive front assessment to improve prognostic stratification in this population. We developed SÉMIL (Semantically-Enhanced Multiple Instance Learning), integrating vision-language foundation models with attention-based multiple instance learning for automated invasiveness assessment from H&E-stained whole slide images. We trained and validated SÉMIL on 1,608 H&E-stained WSIs from three cohorts (Austin n=697, MCO n=478, DYNAMIC n=433). We compared SÉMIL performance against manual pathologist assessment and non-semantic MIL approaches. For binary classification, SÉMIL outperformed non-semantic MIL across all cohorts (external validation: AUC 0.713-0.821 vs 0.686-0.803). For survival prediction, SÉMIL demonstrated validated prognostic stratification in both the internal (Austin: HR=4.73, p=0.0012) and the two external (MCO: HR=2.84, p=0.0032; DYNAMIC: HR=2.10, p=0.0396) stage II validation cohorts. Critically, among National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-defined high-risk stage II patients, SÉMIL successfully stratified outcomes across all three cohorts (HRs 2.96-3.50, all p<0.05), demonstrating consistent reproducible performance. In multivariate analysis of the combined stage II cohort (n=1,220), SÉMIL retained independent prognostic significance (HR=1.98, p=0.005) after adjusting for conventional clinicopathological features including T stage, MMR status, and lymph node examination adequacy. Concordance analysis between SÉMIL and manual assessment showed concordant infiltrative classification identified the highest-risk group (HR=3.96, p<0.0001), with discordant cases showing intermediate risk. SÉMIL demonstrates validated prognostic stratification in stage II colorectal cancer, with potential utility for refining risk assessment within NCCN guideline-defined high-risk categories where treatment decisions are most challenging.